可以用“删除这个"吗?删除当前对象?

Is it OK to use quot;delete thisquot; to delete the current object?(可以用“删除这个吗?删除当前对象?)

问题描述

我正在编写一个链表，我希望结构的析构函数(一个节点结构)简单地删除自身，并且没有任何副作用.我希望我的列表的析构函数在自身上迭代调用 Node 析构函数(临时存储下一个节点)，如下所示:

I'm writing a linked list and I want a struct's destructor (a Node struct) to simply delete itself, and not have any side effects. I want my list's destructor to iteratively call the Node destructor on itself (storing the next node temporarily), like this:

//my list class has first and last pointers
//and my nodes each have a pointer to the previous and next
//node
DoublyLinkedList::~DoublyLinkedList
{
    Node *temp = first();

    while (temp->next() != NULL)
    {
        delete temp;
        temp = temp->next();
    }
}

所以这将是我的 Node 析构函数:

So this would be my Node destructor:

Node::~Node
{
   delete this;
}

这是否可以接受，尤其是在这种情况下?

Is this acceptable, especially in this context?

推荐答案

如果 Node 析构函数正在被调用，那么它已经在被删除的过程中.所以在你的 Node 析构函数中删除是没有意义的.

If the Node destructor is being called, then it's already in the process of being deleted. So a delete doesn't make sense inside your Node destructor.

这也是错误的:

while (temp->next() != NULL)
{
     delete temp;
     temp = temp->next();
}

相反，您应该将 temp->next() 放入临时变量中.否则，您正在访问已删除的内存.

Instead you should get temp->next() into a temp variable. Otherwise you are accessing deleted memory.

更像这样:

DoublyLinkedList::~DoublyLinkedList
{
  Node *temp = first();
  while (temp != NULL)
  {
       Node *temp2 = temp->next();
       delete temp;
       temp = temp2;
  }
}

这篇关于可以用“删除这个"吗?删除当前对象?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持编程学习网！