Using Action dictionaries instead of switch statements(使用 Action 字典而不是 switch 语句)
问题描述
I'm just reviewing some of my old code (have some spare time), and I noticed a rather lengthy switch statement. Due to gaining new knowledge, I have since refactored it in the following form:
private Dictionary<string, Action> createView
{
get
{
return new Dictionary<string, Action>()
{
{"Standard", CreateStudySummaryView},
{"By Group", CreateStudySummaryByGroupView},
{"By Group/Time", CreateViewGroupByHour}
};
}
}
Would you consider this good practise, or is this simply a case of being superflous and unneccessary? I'm keen to ensure new techniques that I learn, are not being clever just for the sake of it, and that they actually add benefit to the code.
Thanks.
Long switch statements are a classic bad smell, and are always a target for refactoring.
The "standard" step to perform here is Replace Conditional with Polymorphism. This was one of the steps listed in Martin Fowler's book Refactoring (published 11 years ago in 1999).
Now that it's so easy to treat functions like objects (eg with Action) this might be just as good a solution.
And no, I don't think you're being clever for the sake of it. If I wanted to add another option in the future, I can easily see what needs to be done.
这篇关于使用 Action 字典而不是 switch 语句的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:使用 Action 字典而不是 switch 语句


基础教程推荐
- 有没有办法忽略 2GB 文件上传的 maxRequestLength 限制? 2022-01-01
- c# Math.Sqrt 实现 2022-01-01
- MS Visual Studio .NET 的替代品 2022-01-01
- 为什么Flurl.Http DownloadFileAsync/Http客户端GetAsync需要 2022-09-30
- SSE 浮点算术是否可重现? 2022-01-01
- 如何激活MC67中的红灯 2022-01-01
- rabbitmq 的 REST API 2022-01-01
- 将 Office 安装到 Windows 容器 (servercore:ltsc2019) 失败,错误代码为 17002 2022-01-01
- 如何在 IDE 中获取 Xamarin Studio C# 输出? 2022-01-01
- 将 XML 转换为通用列表 2022-01-01