Close and Dispose - which to call?(Close and Dispose - 调用哪个?)
问题描述
Having read the threads Is SqlCommand.Dispose enough? and Closing and Disposing a WCF Service I am wondering for classes such as SqlConnection or one of the several classes inheriting from the Stream class does it matter if I close Dispose rather than Close?
I want to clarify this situation.
According to Microsoft guidelines, it's a good practice to provide Close
method where suitable. Here is a citation from Framework design guidelines
Consider providing method
Close()
, in addition to theDispose()
, if close is standard terminology in the area. When doing so, it is important that you make theClose
implementation identical toDispose
...
In most of cases Close
and Dispose
methods are equivalent. The main difference between Close
and Dispose
in the case of SqlConnectionObject
is:
An application can call
Close
more than one time. No exception is generated.If you called
Dispose
methodSqlConnection
object state will be reset. If you try to call any method on disposedSqlConnection
object, you will receive exception.
That said:
- If you use connection object one
time, use
Dispose
. Ausing
block will ensure this is called even in the event of an exception. - If connection object must be reused,
use
Close
method.
这篇关于Close and Dispose - 调用哪个?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:Close and Dispose - 调用哪个?


基础教程推荐
- SSE 浮点算术是否可重现? 2022-01-01
- c# Math.Sqrt 实现 2022-01-01
- 将 XML 转换为通用列表 2022-01-01
- MS Visual Studio .NET 的替代品 2022-01-01
- rabbitmq 的 REST API 2022-01-01
- 将 Office 安装到 Windows 容器 (servercore:ltsc2019) 失败,错误代码为 17002 2022-01-01
- 如何激活MC67中的红灯 2022-01-01
- 有没有办法忽略 2GB 文件上传的 maxRequestLength 限制? 2022-01-01
- 如何在 IDE 中获取 Xamarin Studio C# 输出? 2022-01-01
- 为什么Flurl.Http DownloadFileAsync/Http客户端GetAsync需要 2022-09-30