Java BlockingQueue take() vs poll()(Java BlockingQueue take() 与 poll())
问题描述
When consuming values from a Queue in an infinite loop -- what would be more efficient:
1) Blocking on the Queue until a value is available via take()
while (value = queue.take()) { doSomething(value); }
2) Sleeping for n milliseconds and checking if an item is available
while (true) {
if ((value = queue.poll()) != null) { doSomething(value); }
Thread.sleep(1000);
}
Blocking is likely more efficient. In the background, the thread that initially calls take()
goes to sleep if there is no element available, letting other threads do whatever they need to do. The methods that add elements to the Queue will then wake up waiting threads when an element is added, so minimal time is spent checking the queue over and over again for whether an element is available.
这篇关于Java BlockingQueue take() 与 poll()的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:Java BlockingQueue take() 与 poll()


基础教程推荐
- 验证是否调用了所有 getter 方法 2022-01-01
- 多个组件的复杂布局 2022-01-01
- 如何在 Spring @Value 注解中正确指定默认值? 2022-01-01
- 不推荐使用 Api 注释的描述 2022-01-01
- Java 实例变量在两个语句中声明和初始化 2022-01-01
- 在 Java 中创建日期的正确方法是什么? 2022-01-01
- 大摇大摆的枚举 2022-01-01
- 从 python 访问 JVM 2022-01-01
- Java Swing计时器未清除 2022-01-01
- 如何在 JFrame 中覆盖 windowsClosing 事件 2022-01-01