问题描述
BoxLayout(orientation='vertical') 与 GridLayout(cols=1):
他们都做同样的事情,不是吗?有理由选择其中一个吗?
They both do the same thing, no? Is there a reason to choose one over the other?
推荐答案
区别在于大小和位置.
一般来说,GridLayout (cols: 1) 总是将元素保持在一列中,而有使用 BoxLayout (orientation: 'vertical') 时更灵活地组织单个小部件.
In general, GridLayout (cols: 1) is always going to keep the elements in one column, whereas there is more flexibility to organize individual widgets when you use BoxLayout (orientation: 'vertical').
这是一个非常简单的示例,说明您可以使用 BoxLayout 进行操作,因为它支持 pos_hint、size 和 size_hint(以及其他,例如 center_x、x、y、right,-注意它们也依赖于BoxLayout 的 vertical 或 horizontal 方向会影响各个小部件:
Here is a very simple example of something you can do with BoxLayout because it honours pos_hint, size and size_hint (and others such as center_x, x, y, right, - notice that they also depend on the vertical or horizontal orientation of the BoxLayout) which affects individual widgets:
<Test@BoxLayout>:
orientation: 'vertical'
Button:
text: 'a'
size_hint: None, None
size: 100,50
pos_hint: { 'center_x' : .5 }
Button:
text: 'b'
这是 200x200 屏幕中的输出:
This is the output in a 200x200 screen:
如果您尝试做同样的事情,但改用 GridLayout,那么您会得到:
If you attempt to do the same but using GridLayout instead, then you get this:
最后,GridLayout 有一些属性来控制列的大小:
Finally, GridLayout has some properties to control the size of the column:
col_default_width:为所有列的默认宽度col_width:每列的宽度列表(在此没有用处案例,因为我们只有一个)col_force_default:它将忽略单个小部件的任何现有size_hint或size并强制列宽minimum_width:所以列不会缩小太多
col_default_width: for the default width of all the columnscol_width: a list of widths for each column (not useful in this case since we have just one)col_force_default: which will ignore any existingsize_hintorsizefor individual widgets and force the column widthminimum_width: so the column not shrink too much
这篇关于Kivy:BoxLayout 与 GridLayout的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!


大气响应式网络建站服务公司织梦模板
高端大气html5设计公司网站源码
织梦dede网页模板下载素材销售下载站平台(带会员中心带筛选)
财税代理公司注册代理记账网站织梦模板(带手机端)
成人高考自考在职研究生教育机构网站源码(带手机端)
高端HTML5响应式企业集团通用类网站织梦模板(自适应手机端)