问题描述
funName = () ->
$(".foo").addClass("bar");
Compiles into the scope of an anonymous function. Calling funName from the console results in undefined.
(function() {
var funName;
funName = function() {
return $(".foo").addClass("bar");
};
}).call(this);
What's its reasoning for compiling like this and how do I work with it?
Also any insight on the mandatory return within functions using CoffeeScript would be great. Why is it like that? How do I need to code differently because of it?
Mike has answered the main question here. The modular wrapper a common point of confusion for CoffeeScript newcomers, as illustrated by these related questions:
- How do I define global variables in CoffeeScript?
- Why use the javascript function wrapper (added in coffeescript) ".call(this)"
- Getting rid of CoffeeScript's closure wrapper
As to your other question: If you don't want a function to return anything, simply make the last line of that function either return by itself or, equivalently, undefined. Either will compile to a function with no return. For instance:
funName = ->
$(".foo").addClass "bar"
return
compiles to
var funName;
funName = function() {
$(".foo").addClass("bar");
};
Note that there is an ongoing discussion (issue 899) about a possible alternative syntax for defining no-return functions. If the current proposal were accepted, you'd be able to write your function as
funName = -/> $(".foo").addClass "bar"
If you like that syntax, you should voice your support for it.
这篇关于顶级变量不是全局范围的,在 CoffeeScript 中返回值是强制性的的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!



大气响应式网络建站服务公司织梦模板
高端大气html5设计公司网站源码
织梦dede网页模板下载素材销售下载站平台(带会员中心带筛选)
财税代理公司注册代理记账网站织梦模板(带手机端)
成人高考自考在职研究生教育机构网站源码(带手机端)
高端HTML5响应式企业集团通用类网站织梦模板(自适应手机端)